
Divide and Conquer
Greatly Indebted
Adelson Funded study that is iGaming Out Swinging, To No Body’s Surprise
Las vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson has funded a study that is four-state, unsurprisingly, will not come up in favor of iGaming.
The thing about studies is, you can generally get them to support just about any standpoint on just about anything, based on who is included and exactly how you interpret the data. And if it is mega-billionaire Las Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson funding the findings, you can be sure the studies will go any which way you want ’em to.
Adelson No iGaming Fan Himself
It’s no news that Adelson for reasons which can be perhaps not completely clear to your rest of the mostly pro-iGaming casino industry is vehemently, adamantly opposed to the entire concept of Internet gambling. He’s been proven to refer to the concept that is very ‘a cancer waiting to happen’ and ‘a toxin which all good people need to resist,’ and also funded television and print ads this past summer time towards that end.
Now Adelson’s commissioned poll results on this topic have now been obtained and released by Nevada public affairs reporter Jon Ralston. The findings focus on four potentially key states in this matter: California, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky. Kentucky? Who knew. And even seasoned journalist Ralston who hosts the nightly Las Vegas political news show ‘Face to Face’ has noted on his web log that the findings for the research had been ‘quite startling’; mainly, the rather obviously self-serving leanings towards land gaming and away from the web version of the same. Namely, legal brick-and-mortar gambling enterprises were found to be ‘a means to generate revenue for their state,’ with approval ratings which range from high of 66 percent in Pennsylvania (which includes already proved just as much using their recent development in that arena), 61 percent in Kentucky, 57 percent in California and 54 percent in Virginia.
But the opinions on iGaming were not quite so friendly.
State Budget Crises Affect Outlooks
Specially interesting there is that neither Kentucky nor Virginia already have any land that is legal at this juncture in time. For Pennsylvania and Ca, the support stemmed largely from a want to help offset state budget deficits, even though land-based casino saturation nationwide is currently starting to rear its ugly head and there clearly was more flatlining to come, according to some industry experts. In reality, the land casino that is latest to get up in Pennsylvania Isle of Capri, located in southwestern area Farmington has already been forced to layoff 15 % of its workforce only two months after opening.
Virginia study participants reportedly showed a disdain for ‘Las Vegas-style gaming.’ We guess that’s diverse from state, ‘Indian casino-style gaming’ or ‘politicians-from-the-suburbs-style video gaming.’ Just What?
Where this study that is supposedly unbiased interesting is with its reported findings on Internet gambling, nonetheless. Because, according to the study, in all four queried states, 3x as much of those who participated did not have a positive view of iGaming, with an average that is overall off 66-22 on the ‘ we don’t enjoy it’ part of the fence. Based on wording (surprise, shock), the views shifted slightly, and Kentucky and Virginia individuals stated many vehemently that they were in favor of online casino bans, by 63-27 and 55-33 margins respectively.
The poll did not demonstrably differentiate between general Internet gambling and poker that is online se, however, and before anyone freaks out a lot of in what some of this can potentially mean for the future of state-by-state iGaming being regulated and legalized, keep in mind that, according to poker advocate Marco Valerio back in 2011, 67 percent of New Jerseyans were dead set against online gambling enterprises, and we see how that played out.
Supreme Court Judge Rejects Challenge to New York Casino Referendum
Tioga Downs allows its feelings be known in no uncertain terms regarding brand new York State’s upcoming casino referendum by voters. (Image source: Ithacajournal.com)
A brand New York State judge has refused a challenge to the wording of the latest York’s upcoming casino referendum, paving the way for voters into the state to vote in the measure in November.
The lawsuit ended up being dismissed by State Supreme Court Justice Richard M. Platkin, who found the appropriate challenge to be ‘untimely and with a lack of legal merit.’
Delayed Vote Shot Down
That had been a big blow to opponents associated with the measure, whom had hoped that they might delay a vote, or at least replace the wording that could appear on the ballot. The case ended up being brought up by Brooklyn bankruptcy attorney Eric J. Snyder, who objected to your language used within the referendum question. On the ballot, the measure is going to be described as ‘promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting regional governments to lower property taxes.’
That had been the language which had been authorized by the State Board of Elections in which consulted with Governor Andrew Cuomo to craft the measure july. The governor is a strong supporter of the measure, and crafted a number of compromises and addresses different passions in the state to create this type of proposition possible.
However, Snyder and others said that the language getting used was unfair. Since the language included suggested good outcomes of the casino expansion, it could unfairly bias the outcomes of the referendum. These concerns gained merit that is additional a poll by Siena College discovered that support for the ballot referendum increased by nine percentage points if the positive language was included, in comparison to when more neutral language had been used.
Justice Platkin dismissed these claims, though. He said that Snyder’s lawsuit was filed far after the 14-day window in which challenges to ballot-language are permitted had passed. That window began on August 19 or possibly August 23, according to Snyder, though that could have made difference that is little the challenge had not been made until October 1.
Naturally, the state was delighted that their appropriate arguments were accepted, and that the vote would continue as planned.
‘We’re happy that Judge Platkin accepted the arguments that are legal we raised and that the election process can continue moving forward,’ said Board of Elections spokesman Thomas Connolly.
Opponents Voice Disappointment
Meanwhile, opponents of the measure were predictably disappointed by your decision.
‘We’re disappointed that the judge chose to block a genuine discussion on the merits of whether their state gamed the language of the casino amendment to tilt New Yorkers to a yes vote,’ said a statement by the newest York Public Interest Research Group (NYPIRG).
But Snyder says that he’s not done yet. He plans to get emergency relief from the courts that are appellate and points out that the Board of Elections had the chance to use an previous version of the referendum suggested by the state attorney general’s office that did not are the ‘advocacy language.’
‘Ignoring the attorney general’s recommendation, the Board of Elections changed the neutrally worded casino amendment by adding language to gain voter support,’ Snyder told The New York days.
In the event that measure should pass, lobstermania 2 free slot play it would talk about to seven brand new casino resorts to selected parts of the Empire State. They would join a quantity of existing casinos that are owned and operated by indigenous US groups throughout the area.
